The second column shows my 32-bit Geekbench results for SL on the MBP Row 6 provides the averages for the columns.Īs indicated, Sno looks like the better performer here. The first column below shows my 32-bit Geekbench results for L on my MBP (see sig). (4) 32-bit Geekbench run in 32-bit mode-3,907 avg of 5Īnd, I have been trying to get a feel for the overall performance difference between SL and L. (3) 32-bit Geekbench run in 64-bit mode-3,910 avg of 5 (2) 64-bit Geekbench run in 32-bit mode-4,264 avg of 5 (1) 64-bit Geekbench run in 64-bit mode-4,268 avg of 5 Below are the Geekbench averages for each combination. I made five benchmark passes for each of the four possible combinations of Geekbench “bitness” and Sno kernel mode (e.g., 32-bit Geekbench and 64-bit kernel mode is one such combination). That is, all tests are done on the same machine, using different partitions of the same external drive with identical software set ups (except for pertinent things like the installed OS's). I emphasize that all of my tests are virtually perfectly controlled. You outclass me when it comes to processor speed (see sig). Our machines are rather comparable because I used a 7200 RPM firewire 800 external drive during my tests. For you to have some comparisons, below are my Geekbench and xbench scores. But, xBench, as in your case, shows just the opposite. Geekbench shows what we would expected-Sno being a better performer that Leo. I have done some extremely well-controlled private testing using xBench and Geekbench.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |